beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and for six months, respectively.
However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A served as a public official of Grade VII local administration in the transportation administration division of the Korea Military Service from July 2008 to July 201, 201, and was in charge of trucking freight trucking services from April 2009 to December 2009.
On April 2009, the Defendant applied for a permit for change of freight trucking services through the transfer of freight cars to the H and limited company I and the limited liability company B operated by G (Suspension of indictment) at the transportation administration office of the Ministry of Transport and Maritime Affairs in the B-to-Eup, North Korea (hereinafter referred to as the same day). The Defendant applied for a permit for change of freight trucking services through the transfer of freight cars (Suspension of indictment on the same day).
However, in fact, the application for permission was filed by increasing the number of the vehicle's number plates by repeated transfer and takeover of approximately 30 cargo vehicles between the above three companies, and the application was filed by unlawful means, such as forging a transport contract and submitting it to the company acquiring the vehicle, as if there were transport demand.
Accordingly, the Defendant received solicitation from K to handle well, and actively assisted the above permission application, and attached Form 1) issued 29 bills to the LLC, 107 bills to the limited liability company H, 107 bills to limited liability companies H, and 94 bills of change to limited liability companies I, respectively. In the process, the Defendant was transferred KRW 200,000 from K and G, and KRW 8 million from May 25, 2009, respectively, to the agricultural bank account (L) in the name of the Defendant (M) in the name of the Defendant.
Accordingly, the Defendant received a bribe of 12 million won in total from K, G, and B with respect to his duties.
2. Defendant B
A. The Defendant of the offering of a bribe is operating the J as a limited company located in the former North N, and the Defendant applied for the permission of the change of cargo transport business to the subordinate Gun Office via K, such as Paragraph 1, to the said A, who is a person in charge on June 24, 2009.