logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2012.10.25 2012고정173
업무방해교사
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of three million won, and each of the defendants C shall be punished by a fine of three hundred thousand won.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a non-regular employee belonging to A, who is a man-made company, and Defendant B is an operator of the above "E", and Defendant C is a director belonging to the management office of the F apartment of Seocho-si (hereinafter "the apartment of this case").

On the other hand, the victims are people engaged in human life business.

1. On November 201, Defendant A and Defendant B permitted the president of the G Association, the executing company of the instant apartment, to use the publicity phrase “partnership-designated entity” from H, which is the execution company of the instant apartment. Defendant A and B had the intent to read the instant apartment complex’s interior business by hindering the business of other companies by advertising this.

around January 2012, the Defendant instructed Defendant A to the effect that “the banner remaining from the instant apartment site” is removed, and the Defendant A, around January 20, 2012, at around 15:00, removed a banner from the association. The Defendant: (a) stated that “A is unable to engage in commercial activities in order to manage the apartment site at the association; (b) is unable to take off the banner from the association; (c) is unable to take place in our house.” By threatening the victim, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s human business by force by removing the banner from the site; and (d) interfered with the victim’s human business affairs over seven occasions from that time to February 18, 2012, as indicated in the attached list of crimes.

2. Defendant C:

A. On February 23, 2012, around 11:00, under the direction of J, the managing director of the G Union, the G Association No. 103-502, the victim I, removed a banner for public relations, “I” posted in Betac, thereby hindering the victim’s interior business by force;

B. On February 14, 2012, around 14:00, K, the head of the management office of the apartment of this case, is under the direction of K, the head of the management office of the apartment of this case, and the victim I.

arrow