logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.05.18 2016구합52235
장애등급결정처분취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s disposition of disability ratings rendered against the Plaintiff on July 29, 2015 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. A. On February 2010, the Plaintiff diagnosed as “0.1” of the Mali-si Mali-si Mali-si Mali-si Mali-si Mali-si Mali-si Mali-si Mali-si Mali-si Mali-si Mali-si Mali-si Mali-si Mali-si Mali-si (hereinafter “the 1 diagnosis result”) that “the Mali-

Around May 18, 2015, the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to submit data necessary for re-examination according to the content that “the second-year trial ruling was made” included in the above diagnosis results, and the Plaintiff submitted the result of the examination as well as the result of the re-examination conducted by the Bupyeong-do Hospital on June 30, 2015 on the same day (or 0.06, e.g., the e., the e., the e., e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e.,

B. On July 29, 2015, the Defendant requested the National Pension Service to examine related data, such as the results of the examination of the first and second diagnosis, and on the ground that the Plaintiff rendered a disposition other than the rating of visual disability (hereinafter “instant disposition”), on the ground that “The Plaintiff’s “it is not recognized that two eyes are in a state of disability when considering the state of satisical change, the degree of satise and marity on the ground as a result of the examination of the CY, the treatment progress in the medical record area, etc.”

C. Around August 19, 2015, the Plaintiff dissatisfied with the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Defendant on September 11, 2015, along with the result of the visual performance test conducted at the International Estol University International Estol University (e.g., 0. 08 of the Mastopium 0.08 of the Mastopium, and the Mastop safety manual; hereinafter “the result of the third diagnosis”). However, the said application was dismissed on October 12, 2015.

After that, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal with the Incheon Metropolitan City Administrative Appeals Commission on October 12, 2015, but the said appeal was dismissed on February 29, 2016.

On the other hand, the result of the court's entrustment of physical examination to the Korea National University Cancer Hospital is below.

arrow