A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who conducts the business of providing Internet computer game facilities in the name of "C," in G, G,B.

No one shall provide game products, the contents of which are different from the classification obtained, for distribution or use.

Nevertheless, from April 2019 to February 11, 2020, the Defendant provided a direct charging method using game money by receiving cash from customers and charging game money through the manager's page, unlike the content of the rating classification, to customers who found the game money in the above C.

As a result, the defendant provided game products with contents different from the contents of the classification.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Requests for cooperation to send a game product description (request for the cooperation), submission of a report on investigation (Attachment to C on-site photographs), investigation report (related to suspect's suspicions of providing altered game products), investigation report (related to operating methods different from the manual of use of new capital stock game), and application of statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the facts constituting a crime and subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Selection of Punishment and Promotion of Game Industry;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution provides game contents different from the rated game products for use in the course of operating a scambling room, and the responsibility for the act is a longer term of crime.

However, considering the fact that the defendant shows an attitude to recognize and reflect the crime, the fact that the defendant's gains acquired by the crime seems to have not many, and other factors such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstances leading to each of the crimes of this case, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account various sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments