logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2016.01.11 2015고합104
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(장애인강간)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for ten years.

The information on the accused shall be disclosed and notified for a period of ten years.

Reasons

Criminal facts

And Facts constituting the cause of the attachment order / [crime]

1. On July 19, 2015, around July 19, 2015, the Defendant and the claimant for an attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) discovered the victim (hereinafter “the victim”) who continued to have been around the north-Gu C around the port of port on the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (e.g., a deceptive scheme against the disabled person).

The victim was a woman with a disability of grade 1 of intellectual disability, and the defendant first judged the victim, but did not answer the victim's words, and continued to return to the surrounding area, and the victim knew that the victim is a person with a disability with less decentralization than the general public, so that the victim is willing to have sexual intercourse with the victim, and "I am like I am in the house."

After the phrase “the victim’s hand and kne and kne, kne and kne in the victim’s kne and kne, and sexual intercourse with the victim by inserting the victim’s kne and kne and kne in the victim’s kne and kne and kne in the victim’s sexual organ into the victim’s sexual organ.”

Accordingly, the defendant has sexual intercourse with the victim who has a mental disability by force.

2. On September 14, 2015, the Defendant discovered a victim △△△△△ (the age of 59) who is waiting to wait for a bus in front of D apartment units located in North-gu, North Korea at the port on September 14, 2015.

The victim is a woman with a disability of Grade 2, Section 2, Section 3 of the intellectual disability, Section 3, and the defendant was aware of the fact that the victim was a disabled person who is more inconvenience than the general public because the victim knew that he was aware of the fact that he was frighting in the usual victim and welfare center, etc., and the victim was aware that he was a disabled person who is more inconvenience than the general public, and the victim was sexual intercourse with the defendant's house where there is no family member.

arrow