logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.04.19 2017고단611
폭행
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is the company member of the instant facts charged.

On November 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 01:30 on November 10, 2016, to the victim C (32 years of age, south) who sees urine within the male toilets of the first floor underground floor of the building D in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si; and (b) without any justifiable reason, “the Defendant laid down this son.”

In this regard, the victim's head was 2 times, and the victim's head was assaulted continuously by the victim's head, and the victim's head was flicker in the victim's corridor in the victim's corridor.

2. Determination

A. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to facts charged - Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act

(b) Offense of Non-Punishment of Intention - Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act

(c) Declaration of intention of the victim not to punish him/her after public prosecution is instituted: Submission of a written agreement on March 27, 2017;

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow