1. The defendant shall display the annexed drawings (1), (2), (3), (4), and (1) among the first floor of the building listed in the annexed Table 1 list to the plaintiff.

The following facts are acknowledged by the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 as a whole and there is no dispute between the parties.

On February 9, 195, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a lease agreement with regard to KRW 15,00,000, monthly rent of KRW 280,000, and the lease term of November 25, 1995, with regard to KRW 99,00,00,00 of the attached drawing Nos. 2, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

The plaintiff and the defendant impliedly renewed the contract at the time of termination of the above lease contract until now.

(The term of lease following the renewal of a Roman contract seems to be until November 24, 2015). The Defendant delayed at least two times in arrears at least, and the Plaintiff, on the ground of this, terminated the lease contract on December 2014 and notified the Defendant by content-certified mail.

After the filing of the instant lawsuit, the Defendant paid the sum of the overdue rent to July 23, 2015 before the date of the closing of argument.

According to the above facts, the lease contract of this case was lawfully terminated.

As such, the Defendant is obligated to order the Plaintiff to clarify the instant real estate, and is obligated to pay the amount calculated at the rate of KRW 280,000 per month from July 24, 2015 to the completion date of the name of the instant real estate.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is decided as per Disposition.