A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accidenting Measures) are those who are engaged in driving of CSMM drive vehicles.

At around 16:20 on January 22, 2013, the first accident Defendant driven the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol with 0.178% of alcohol concentration 0.178%, and turned it over bypass in the direction of dialogue from the direction of the erogic village the three-lane road in front of the Maampampampling pharmacy located in the Pampampling-gu, U.S. in the ancient city.

At the time, there was a center line of the yellow-line line at the intersection, so there was a duty of care to ensure that the driver is obliged to operate safely with the front line thoroughly and to protect the tea.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and was driven by the victim D(W, 34 years old) in the opposite lane due to the negligence of the bypassing the center line, and was driven by the Defendant as the front driver of the motor vehicle with the motor vehicle driving by the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant, by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, suffered from the fluoral finites requiring medical treatment for the victim, and at the same time, the repair cost, such as the exchange of the finites, destroyed the above damaged vehicle to the extent that the 228,598 won was damaged, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victim.

B. After having paid the said accident, the Defendant continued to drive the said accident, and continued to drive the road in front of the entrance of the 3rd village complex of the Hanyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-si, in the direction of the Convention high school to make a right-hand direction in the direction of dialogue.

Since there are also the center line of the yellow-line line in the intersection, there was a duty of care to safely operate the vehicle to the person engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to commit it, and he is against the negligence of the right-handing.