(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.10.17 2017고단3302

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.10.17 2017고단3302

무고

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 7, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for the acquisition of stolen goods at the Seoul Central District Court, and completed the enforcement of the above sentence at the Seoul Detention Center on November 30, 2016.

around December 2016, the Defendant drafted a false complaint with respect to D and E using a computer located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “C” company located therein.

The statement of the complaint states that "the defendant D and E conspired to lend money of KRW 200 million to the defendant D and E by taking advantage of the vehicle as security, and the above vehicles could not be provided as security as a car owned by the capital-oriented company, and the defendant's tenant did not fully pay 200 million won, so they would not be punished for fraud," and the fact that "the defendant purchased KRW 200 million to export the above vehicles from D and the defendant did not receive money by fraud in collusion with D and E.

Nevertheless, on January 2, 2017, the Defendant submitted the above written complaint to the employees of the civil petition office, whose name is not known in the Seoul Northern District Public Prosecutor's Office, the Seoul Northern District Public Prosecutor's Office in 747, Dobong-gu Seoul Central Public Prosecutor's Office.

As a result, the defendant was sentenced to criminal punishment against D and E, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the witness D;

1. Statement of the accused in the suspect examination protocol concerning D by the prosecution;

1. A's accusation;

1. A report on investigation or a report on interrogation of suspect;

1. Previous Records: A written reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and the personal acceptance status [The above evidence shows that the defendant was transferred to send the above Do Do Ra8, Pura 458 Italy, Slar Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do, the defendant did not anticipate the situation where the defendant would return the above vehicles to D or D Do Do Do Do do do do do , and the above vehicles

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.17 2017고단4935

-서울서부지방법원 2018.02.20 2017고단1654 (1)

-서울서부지방법원 2018.01.18 2017고단2880

-인천지방법원 2017.08.09 2017고단1466

-대전지방법원 2018.01.12 2017고정1088