logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.02.20 2018고정517
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 17, 2018, at around 15:03, the Defendant suffered a dispute with the victim D (Nam, 65 years of age) and “the landscape surrounding the new community center, the landscape of the C Village E warehouse, and the family package of the Defendant,” before the construction site of the C community center located in B of the former North Korea on March 17, 2018, the Defendant suffered an assault, such as the victim’s face from the victim’s hand, and the difference between the surface of the bridge and the part of the bridge, which led the victim to an assault, and the victim was pushed the victim by hand, and caused the victim’s bodily harm, etc. requiring approximately two weeks medical treatment.

2. On March 27, 2018, at around 14:30, the Defendant damaged public documents, after completing an investigation at the F Office of the Forest Station in the Forest Station in the forest room located in 1702, a forest room in the forest room in the front-gun, Eup, North Korea, the Defendant was unable to believe the police investigation due to the removal and manipulation of major pages, such as the ctv video data that he/she was assaulted by the aforesaid D from the above D, and the hacks that he/she was involved in the second damage with the hack pipe in the dry field, and the hacks that he/she was involved in the second damage with the hacks inside the dry field. The judicial police officer G who belongs to the above police station,

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the Defendant’s examination protocol, which is a document used by public offices, thereby impairing its utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and H;

1. Investigation report (suspect A suspect's interrogation protocol refusal to affix his/her signature and seal and damage to protocol);

1. An injury diagnosis certificate (D);

1. The suspected victim's photograph, photograph, photograph, photograph (field verification), photograph (ctv analysis at the site of the case), and photograph (a suspect interrogation protocol destroyed and damaged);

1. Separate (2) - Ctv video data (Ctv video data, March 23, 2018), the site condition of which at the time of committing the crime, is recorded, can be admitted as evidence if it is proved that the subject was recorded with non-statement evidence.

Witness

G According to the testimony of G, G, a police officer, is a video file stored in ctv which was installed at the present site of this case in usb.

arrow