Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Except as otherwise provided for in other Acts, no person shall take over any access medium used in the transaction of a financial institution.
The Defendant, under the direction of the one-time bearers (hereinafter “C”) who manage the solicitation of passbooks, the books of withdrawal of deposits, etc. in the telephone finance fraud group (hereinafter “Scing”), received kwikset through Kwikset’s service website, and served as the responsibility for remitting money by collecting and conveying cash from the one-time bearers who instruct C to transfer money by collecting and delivering the cash to Kwikset’s officers, and the amount of damage.
On April 20, 2017, the Defendant received, according to C’s instructions, 8 copies of the check card from an employee of Kwikset service-based service-based (E) in the name-based Kwikset service-based service-based, who had been at the location of 60 subway 3, Goyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-si, Seoyang-si, the Defendant issued 8 copies of the check card to Kwikset service-based, who had been connected with the former North Bank Account (E) in the name of D.
Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with C in each way with access media.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each investigation report (including the sequence 8, 11, and appended materials of evidence list);
1. Application of respective existing Acts and subordinate statutes of subparagraphs 1 through 11 of this Article;
1. Article 49 (4) 1 and Article 6 (3) 1 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions, Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;
1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Du1168, Apr.
1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act of confiscation.