beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On August 13, 2002, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court on May 3, 2004, sentenced to a fine of 2 million won for the same crime in the same court on May 3, 2004, sentenced to a suspended sentence of 10 months for the same crime in the same court on November 16, 2004, sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years for the same crime. On September 14, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in the same court on September 14, 2006, and was sentenced to a fine of 3 million won for the same crime on March 9, 2010.
【Criminal Facts】
On July 25, 2014, at around 00:05, the Defendant driven BS5 cars with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.185% at approximately 15 meters from the entrance of the 2nd door of the Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si to the 19th day of the 19th day of the Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Report on the results of the control of drinking driving, and report on the state of drinking drivers;
1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, references to criminal records, and each copy of judgment;
1. Article 148-2(1)1 and Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act regarding criminal facts, the reason for sentencing of sentence of imprisonment for the option, even though the defendant has committed a crime of multiple kinds including a punishment, he/she again commits the crime of drinking alcohol in this case despite the fact that the defendant had a large number of criminal records of the same kind of crime, and the fact that the drinking water in this case belongs to a high level, etc., the sentence of sentence is inevitable considering the sentencing conditions unfavorable to the defendant, and the sentence is determined as per the disposition, comprehensively taking into account various sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.