logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.01.16 2012고단3869
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, each of the defendants B.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around September 2006, Defendant A made a false statement to the effect that “F is the joint representative director of F with G, and the said company will be selected as a rebuilding project operator of the E zone. When selected as a rearrangement project, the said Defendant would give priority to receiving removal projects.”

However, even if the defendant is selected as a rearrangement project operator, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to take the removal work.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received a total of KRW 150 million from the victim on September 8, 2006, as indicated below, until November 8, 2007, including that he received KRW 3 million from the victim on September 8, 2006.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to take the property by deceiving the victim.

On September 8, 2006, the amount of temporary payment method of the check (enterprise H-I) three million won on January 23, 2007 (one million won on September 14, 2006) 40 million won on the check (enterprise K-L) on September 14, 2006, and five million won on September 22, 2006 (M on September 22, 2006), the remittered enterprise on September 13, 2007; one million won on September 23, 2006, five million won on the remittance on February 13, 2007 (one million won on September 23, 2006, one million won on the remittance; two million won on November 23, 2006; one million won on the cash transfer of one million won or more on November 27, 2006; one million won on September 15, 2007; and

2. Defendant B is a person who is in office as a general director of the committee for the promotion of redevelopment in the area E, and Defendant B made money from the Ulsan-gu E-gu reconstruction office on January 22, 2007, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, to the effect that the victim D would use the money without any use. As the reconstruction association will be the president of the reconstruction association, Defendant B would make a false statement to the effect that the removal work would be ordered on the face of the State.

arrow