The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is acknowledged that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case and against the mistake. Meanwhile, even though the defendant had previously been punished by the same crime, he participated in the crime of selling the fake petroleum product of this case and arrange the distribution of the fake petroleum product of this case or actually operated and managed the gas station. As such, the quantity and the amount of sales of fake petroleum products distributed by the defendant in collusion with the crime of this case are considerably significant. Such crime is highly harmful to the society, such as the disturbance of the distribution order of petroleum products and the aggravation of the performance of automobiles, and the reduction of national tax revenue from tax evasion, etc., so there is no need to punish such crime, and there is no special reason to change the sentence of the court below even if the reason for the sentencing of the court below was reasonable, and there is no other special reason to change the defendant's age, character, intelligence, environment, motive, motive, method, method, and consequence of the crime of this case, and there is no undue relation between the defendant and the above punishment before and after the crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.