The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

The defendant shall have 40-hour sexual traffic.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant: The sentence of the lower court (two months of imprisonment, etc.) is too unreasonable.

B. Prosecutor: The sentence of the lower court is too uneasible.

2. The judgment of the defendant is contrary to the full recognition of each of the crimes of this case.

It is difficult to recognize that the defendant has sexual intercourse with the victim by using deceptive schemes or force.

There is a family member to support the accused.

On the other hand, the Defendant, who became aware of the “twitter”, had 15-year-old female juveniles purchase their sex twice.

These crimes may have a negative impact on the establishment of the sexual identity and values of the target juveniles, as well as the sexual culture of our society may have a serious adverse impact on the sexual culture, and the responsibility for such crimes is heavy.

Furthermore, the defendant began to commit the crime with the knowledge of the target juvenile as the first grade of high school, and continued to commit the crime even after the juvenile became aware that he was the third grade of middle school, and even after having become aware that he was the third grade of middle school, he got a female member of the juvenile who was suffering from school to go back to the telecoming with his her scamb

In addition, the defendant tried to purchase the sex of the target juvenile, and was arrested by the police.

In addition, on July 15, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years for a violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, and sentenced to a suspended sentence of four years for the same month on the 23th day of the same month, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 23th day of the same month, as well as on August 8, 2017 and November 22, 2018, respectively, committed each of the instant crimes again, even though the Defendant was notified of a summary order of one million won for each of the instant crimes.

The crime of violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse is committed by the defendant, and the defendant has taken the body pictures and videos of the victim through hosting, and then the victim refuses to take the body pictures and videos of the victim.