logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.11.28 2014고합8
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)
Text

The Defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment of this case is publicly notified.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, in the facts charged, established a corporation F, a corporation that is a stock company, with the intention to develop and sell a house for the use of the entire land in the above E where the sale of the house for the use of the electric source was led to the development of the house for the use of the electric source, while purchasing and owning the land, etc. in the land, etc. in the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, where the Defendant was affiliated with,

On June 108, 2008, when C became aware that there was a large amount of money as C met with around April 2008, C was delivered KRW 20 million from C to a new bank account (Account Number G) in the name of the Defendant on the following grounds: (a) around June 10, 2008, at the site of the E-owned Housing Corporation, the agreement was reached to the effect that “E-owned housing was almost all of the E-owned housing, but the company did not pay interest.”

In addition, the Defendant stated in the indictment that “2 billion won” is stated in the indictment in the sum of KRW 33 times from June 10, 2008 to January 31, 201, such as the payment of interest on loans and the construction cost of electric house, etc., monthly from June 10, 2008 to January 31, 201, while the Defendant would have to repay the entire house to C as above. However, according to the list of crimes in the attached Form, it appears that “2 billion won” is a clerical error of “2 billion won.”

was issued by the Corporation.

However, in fact, the Defendant started the development project with a loan of KRW 2 billion and KRW 800,000 from the bank loan of KRW 2 billion and the loan of KRW 2 billion from the land in security without one percentage while commencing the said electric source housing development project without any other cash assets. The Defendant had to pay KRW 14,00,000 per month for the interest on the loan of KRW 2 billion, and there was no intention or ability to repay the loan even if it borrowed money from C because it did not properly sell the electric source housing.

Accordingly, the defendant deceiving C and belongs to it.

arrow