logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019. 02. 14. 선고 2018가단228595 판결
이 사건 공탁금 출급 청구권은 원고에게 있다[국패]
Title

The Plaintiff is entitled to claim the payment of the instant deposit.

Summary

The court held that the right to claim the withdrawal of the deposit of this case has priority over the plaintiff, who is not the defendants, due to the deposit of creditor's unrefluent deposit and the execution deposit due to concurrent seizure of the claim to return the lease deposit

Related statutes

Article 1 of the National Tax Collection Act

Cases

Seoul Western District Court 2018 Ghana 228595 Deposit Payment Claim

Plaintiff

AA

Defendant

BB

Conclusion of Pleadings

.01.10

Imposition of Judgment

oly 2019.14

Text

1. Claim for payment of deposit money indicated in the attached list and interest thereon against the Plaintiff

confirm that such act has been committed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person;

Cheong-gu Office

The same shall apply to the order.

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: To be as specified in attached Form 1;

2. 가. 피고 QQ, WW: 자백간주 판결 (민사소송법 제208조 제3항 제2호)

(b) Defendant Z: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

(c) Defendant F: Not clearly disputing the Plaintiff’s cause of the claim; provided, however, that:

Although the Defendant released the seizure of the claim for payment of deposit money, the Plaintiff paid the deposit money.

in order to file a lawsuit against the defendant, the court has the interest in the lawsuit to be subject to this judgment.

c.

arrow