1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff is Birs, and served as fire-fighting officials from August 12, 1986 to May 30, 2008.

B. On July 3, 200, the Plaintiff was performing rescue activities on July 10, 200 and July 14, 200, and July 14, 200;

7.21.

9.4. On three occasions, C Hospital received a diagnosis of the escape from the external signboard at C Hospital. On September 19, 200, D Hospital received a diagnosis of “the 4-5 thire of the external signboard escape certificate” and “the 4-5 thirebrate No. 4-5 vertebrate No. 4-5 vertebrate,” and received an external test of the external signboard escape certificate and the vertebrate convergence surgery.

C. On June 5, 2001, the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State to the head of the Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Ma (hereinafter “Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Mapo-Ma

The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the head of Sinpo Military Court 2002Guhap950 on August 22, 2002 against the head of Sinpo Military Court 2002 against the head of Sinpo Military Court 2002 against whom the judgment against the losing party was rendered.

On September 9, 2008, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the head of the Incheon Veterans Branch for the "propeach-five escape certificate" to the person who rendered distinguished services to the State, and the head of the Incheon Veterans Branch rendered a disposition corresponding to the amount of distinguished services to the State on February 5, 2010.

The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the head of the Incheon District Court 2010Gudan600, which sought revocation of the disposition corresponding to the person of distinguished service to the State, and was sentenced to the judgment against February 17, 2011. The appellate court dismissed the appeal in the Seoul High Court 2011Nu10135, and the appellate court dismissed the appeal in the Supreme Court 201Du3035, respectively.

E. On July 28, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person eligible for veteran’s compensation with the Defendant for “protruding escape from the 4-5th century” (hereinafter “protruding escape from the application”). On February 17, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition against the Plaintiff on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between his/her duties and the application.

[Ground of recognition] dispute.