logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.07.20 2015가합104934
배당이의
Text

1. The part of the instant lawsuit against the Defendant, Japan Construction Co., Ltd. and A shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's defendant Republic of Korea

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Korea Land and Housing Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Korea Land and Housing Corporation”) that entered into a contract for the work between Thai and the Non-Party Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Non-Party Corporation”) decided on December 21, 2012 that the Daejeon Housing Landscape Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “1BL Landscape Corporation”) performed by the Non-Party Corporation was awarded a contract for the work of KRW 2,579,767,00 at the price for Taedae-dae (the trade name before and after the modification is the “Sanam Construction of the Company”; hereinafter referred to as the “Saland construction”) on December 21, 201

(hereinafter “instant contract”). Since then, the said amount was changed to KRW 2,106,838,484.

B. Thailand Construction’s Claim Attachment and Assignment Order 1) On April 30, 2012

hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Domestic Construction”

) On April 25, 2012, a notary public who borrowed KRW 500,00 from the construction of the Republic of Korea on May 3, 2012, 2012, with the content that “in the event that Taestostos tostos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos tos

(2) On December 17, 2012, the instant order for seizure and assignment of claims was issued by the said court on December 17, 2012 with the title of execution of the instant notarial deed as the title of execution, and as to KRW 300 million out of the claim for construction payment under the instant contract that Taetoto Land was held by the Daejeon District Court No. 2011, 17148.

The above decision was served on the non-party corporation, the garnishee on December 21, 2012. C. The defendant Republic of Korea (competent: Daejeon District Office, the first Daejeon District Office, in charge of the tax affairs of Tae-to-land, but the competent authority was changed to the Daejeon District Office.

section 2.2.

arrow