logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2013.05.14 2013고단110
자동차관리법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 15:00 on December 24, 2012, the Defendant operated a B observer car, the registration of which was cancelled on September 15, 2009, without registering it in the register of automobiles, from about 4 km to the roads in front of the sports ground located in Mansan-dong at the time of residence without obtaining a driver's license for a motor vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. The motor vehicle register [it is recognized that the defendant knew that the motor vehicle was not registered in the motor vehicle register at the time when the defendant entered the facts of the crime and was not registered in the motor vehicle register, in accordance with the circumstances shown in the prosecutor's statement of the defendant which is recognized that the defendant not only recognized the facts of the crime in the court but also

1. Article 80 subparagraph 1 of the relevant Act, the main sentence of Article 5, subparagraph 1 of Article 152, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. On October 16, 2007, the Defendant was released from a suspended sentence of two years on May 15, 2008 on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant, on the ground of his non-licensed driving and was notified of a fine on October 16, 2007; and (b) the Defendant, on December 8, 2007, driven a vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance and attempted to overtake beyond the central line, thereby inflicting an injury on others; and (c) was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on May 15, 2008 and an order to take a compliance driving course.

Nevertheless, on March 28, 2009, the Defendant purchased the instant vehicle, which is the so-called large-type large-sized vehicle, without being familiar with the Defendant, and seems to have continued to operate the said vehicle without any different circumstances up to now.

In this process, the Defendant was subject to a disposition of suspending indictment on August 24, 2010 on the violation of the Automobile Management Act, and on May 31, 2012.

arrow