logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2015.11.12 2013가합8288
공탁금출급청구권 확인의 소
Text

1. Between the Appointer Co., Ltd. and the Defendants, as well as the Co., Ltd.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff and the designated parties (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff, etc.”) and the Defendant tin village Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “company name”) ordered the Gyeonggi-do Office of Education from Defendant Do Do Do EL Construction to build new construction works at the AE High School (hereinafter referred to as the “AE High School”) and implemented the construction by entering into a subcontract with some of the following construction costs:

(2) On October 31, 2012, the first subcontract price (won) was 902,00,000, the first subcontract price (hereinafter “the subcontracted project”). Plaintiff A, a subcontractor, the first subcontract price of which was 312,40,000,00 (hereinafter “the first subcontract price”) was 324,280,000 (hereinafter “the instant subcontracted project”). The first subcontract price was 1,035,00,000 (hereinafter “the instant subcontracted project”). Defendant 1,035,10,000 (hereinafter “the first subcontract price”) was 31,204,280,000 U.S. Damo Construction on July 31, 2012 (hereinafter “the instant subcontracted project”).

B. Around November 2012, the Plaintiff, etc., and the Defendant tin village agreed to pay the subcontract price to the Plaintiff, etc. directly by the ordering person during the instant subcontract construction work.

C. Since then, the plaintiff, etc. and the defendant Dai-do Office of Education notified the Gyeonggi-do Office of Education, the ordering person of the above direct payment agreement. On December 10, 2012, the Gyeonggi-do Office of Education, after examining the contents of the agreement, sent to the plaintiff, the selected person, the Nam-nam, the Multi-child Construction, and the defendant Dai-ri, an official door containing the following contents: "the notice of the subcontract agreement of the instant construction project is known" to the designated person on December 14, 2012, and the designated person, the letter "the notification of the subcontract of the instant construction project" was sent to the designated person, the letter "the notification of the subcontract of the construction project of this case is known." The payment method of the subcontract of the subcontractor and the payment method of the subcontract of this case is 902,00,000,000, 312,400, 00, 00, 00, 300, 06, 3005, 060

D. Plaintiff.

arrow