logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.05.24 2016가단885
건물명도등
Text

1. The defendant

(a) Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, 13 Dong 404;

B. From 9,978,800 won and December 20, 2015

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On March 30, 2015, the Plaintiff leased the Plaintiff’s Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and 13 Dong 404 (hereinafter “instant real estate”) to the Defendant for the lease deposit of KRW 20,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 1,800,000, and the lease period from April 20, 2015 to April 20, 2017.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

However, the Defendant did not pay monthly rent and management expenses from September 2015, and the Plaintiff sent a certificate to the effect that, if the monthly rent is not paid by the end of December 23, 2015, the Plaintiff complied with the promise to specify the instant real estate in the event that the monthly rent is not paid by the end of December 2015.

C. As of December 20, 2015, the Defendant did not pay monthly rent of KRW 7,200,000 (per four months) and management expenses of KRW 2,778,80 (per ten months).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above fact-finding, since the lease contract of this case was terminated due to the Defendant’s non-payment of rent, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount equivalent to KRW 2,078,80,00, which is the amount equivalent to the rent and management fee from December 20, 2015 to the time of delivery of the instant real estate, with the monthly rent and management fee in arrears, and unjust enrichment from December 20, 2015.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow