logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.10.21 2016고정385
상해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 5, 2015, at around 16:30, the Defendant: (a) reported the victim B (the victim (the victim 61 years of age) and his activities in front of the ordinary house E in Yongsan-si; and (b) reported the victim’s gambling without gambling; and (c) made a false report to the police station where he did not do so; (d) and (e) caused the victim’s head collection to go away; and (e) made a violence 20 times on the ground floor to put the head collection to approximately 14 days, and (e) put the victim’s head head collection into a multi-lock, spambling, e-mail, etc.

2. Defendant B, at the above date and at the above time and place, fucks to the assault of the victim A (n, 60 years of age), and the quibbucks of the female to be humpbucks, caused by the assault of the victim A (n, 60 years of age) to put about three weeks of treatment, such as base base, both sides, dump dump dump, dump dump dump sump s

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Partial statement of the witness B;

1. A written diagnosis of injury to B (record No. 40 pages);

1. Report of internal investigation (record No. 7) (Defendant B);

1. A’s legal statement;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to internal investigation reports (in relation to the submission of photographs on the upper part of the suspect A), photographs;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the Defendants who choose the punishment for the crime:

1. Defendants of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendants of the provisional payment order: Determination on the Defendants B and their defense counsel’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the assertion is that Defendant B continued assaulted by A, while taking a head debt from A and taking off on the ground floor, he may kill A while leaving the ground floor. The act of Defendant B can be permitted in light of social norms. The act of Defendant B can be permitted in light of social norms.

arrow