logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.07.20 2018노1953
명예훼손
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the above judgment shall be publicly notified.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant, for the purpose of recording, was not guilty of defamation in order to decrease the social assessment of the victim, only some of the remarks of A, which unilaterally proceed with conversations.

However, the court below found the defendant guilty by misunderstanding the facts.

2. On September 20, 2016, A, the summary of the facts charged of the instant case, with the Defendant and the victim E, who had telephone conversations at an insular location, is one of the following reasons: “A, while having been talked with the Defendant, has run CCTV in a room,” the victim E.

It is necessary to buckbuck off the CCTV in the 201222, so that the CCTV can be found in the bucker's room, and the CCTV can be found in the room.

Monopoly, nives so doing in the room; or

The term "influor" means "influor, fluor, fluor," and so on, the term is so on.

I do not do so for each coming person, and we must do so. I do so. It means that two or more people who want to do so, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, in

To start, those who have been working in Korea, who have been employed by those who have been employed by the woman, are only her fluencing, and those who have been employed in F, have been employed to do so, and even in F, they do not seem to have a lot of fluencing.

그거 뭐 같지도 않은 사람 뭘 그걸.” 이라고 말하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with A, damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts.

3. 1) The lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged by integrating the evidence presented in its judgment.

2) In order to establish the crime of defamation, whether factual defamation, or defamation or defamation, the court’s determination is false, specific facts sufficient to lower the person’s social assessment as a subjective element and objective element.

arrow