1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 29, 2015, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea as a foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of Liberia (hereinafter “Liberia”) of the Republic of Liberia (hereinafter “Liberia”).

B. On March 10, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant, but on March 23, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition for recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “the well-founded fear that there is a concern for persecution” as prescribed by Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

C. On April 7, 2017, the Plaintiff appealed to the instant disposition and filed an objection with the Minister of Justice, but the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground as October 11, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion beliefed that the Islamic bridge was the original Islamic bridge, but the Plaintiff joined the Republic of Korea on July 2014.

The plaintiff's referring is a Islamic mar, a Islamic mar, and threatens the plaintiff with other Muslim after being aware that the plaintiff's mar is a new species.

On the other hand, in Liberia, the plaintiff's home country, has a wind that the candidates were involved in the presidential election and jacking a large number of unspecified people and jacking them as a product, and the plaintiff's private village was kidnapped around March 2017 and now the life and death could not be known.

If the plaintiff comes to return to his own country, it is likely to be threatened with the above reasons for life or physical freedom.

Nevertheless, the disposition of this case which rejected the Plaintiff’s application for refugee status should be revoked as it is unlawful.

(b).