logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.11.24 2017가단11738
임대보증금반환
Text

1. The Defendant: 50,000,000 won to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from May 29, 2017 to September 2, 2017.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim of the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor

(a) Indication of claims: To be as shown in the grounds for the application;

(However, the creditor shall be deemed the plaintiff and the debtor).

Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act (Service by Public Notice, Absence)

2. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant on the premise that the plaintiff's claim is no longer a creditor since it transferred the plaintiff's claim against the defendant to the plaintiff's successor intervenor during the proceeding of the lawsuit in this case, and thus, it cannot be accepted.

arrow