logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.11.25 2016고단1997
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Highest 1997]

1. On July 31, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E, who is a mid-to-face with D, which reads that “I would like to purchase a BM passenger car with the winning 1, etc. of the Rototo 1, and would receive a vehicle payment by finding the moto prize.” On August 1, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim “D” to “I will pay the Doto Hato Hato Ha to the Agricultural Bank Account, and if I would have deposited the Doto Hato Hato Ha to pay, I would pay it with the vehicle payment if I lend money.”

However, the defendant did not have any winning in the Roto 1, etc., and even if he purchased a vehicle or borrowed money from the victim because there was no other property, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay or repay the money borrowed from the victim.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 2 million as the borrowed money immediately from the victim, and acquired the FW car in the amount of KRW 1,738,00 at the market price of 14:00 on the same day and acquired it by deceiving the victim.

2. Although the Defendant was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle that is not covered by mandatory insurance on the road, the Defendant operated a FW Motor Vehicle that is not covered by mandatory insurance on August 10, 2016, on the front of the G-si, Busan on August 23:50.

[2016 Highest 2298]

3. On June 21, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim H, “The Defendant was awarded 3.8 billion won prize with Roto 1, etc., and received 3.8 billion won prize. The Defendant found the prize money and then deposited KRW 10 million in advance, in order to reduce KRW 500 million.”

However, the defendant did not have any winnings in 1 et al., and even if he received money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to return the money.

As such, the Defendant deceivings the victim, and thereby, from the victim, 9.8 million won to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

arrow