logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 (춘천) 2018.09.17 2018누536
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiffs citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance, the findings and determination of the court of first instance are

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Plaintiffs in this court, however, alleged that melting germs was vulnerable to pulmonary infection due to pneumoconiosis and its complications, and that the disease and its complications have influenced the aggravation of the pulmonary health. However, it is difficult to conclude that melting germs affected the pulmonary health of the deceased merely because melting germs was detected in the process of treating the deceased’s pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary treatment, etc., and that the decline in the pulmonary pulmonary function caused by pneumoconiosis affect the deceased’s pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary ur.

arrow