beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months of imprisonment with labor for a crime of violating road traffic law in the support of the Sugwon method, on July 7, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 15, 2016. On August 11, 2016, the same court was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for imprisonment with labor for a period of four months for fraud and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for August 19, 2016 and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 19, 2016.
[2] On March 4, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a motor vehicle without obtaining a motor vehicle driver’s license in a section of about 30 km in front of the Do office located in Ansan-dong around 16:00 to the front day of the Do office in the front of the Do office of the Do office of the Do office of the Do office of the Do office of the Do office of the Do; and (b) drive the B
Summary of Evidence
1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;
1. The driver's license ledger and the driver's license ledger;
1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and an investigation report (No. 14 No. 5 of the evidence list);
1. In addition, considering the fact that there are many criminal convictions for the reasons of sentencing under Article 152 subparagraph 1 of the pertinent Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts, the fact that the defendant again committed the instant crime during the period of suspension of execution of the same criminal records, and other types of crimes committed several times, which are disadvantageous to the disadvantage of the defendant. In addition, even though the full bench notified the date for successful telephone call with the defendant that it was difficult to make it difficult, the defendant did not appear on the fixed date, taking into account all the factors of sentencing as indicated in the arguments and records of the instant case, such as the fact that the defendant did not appear on the fixed date.