logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.01.30 2014고합569
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(위계등간음)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is in charge of the "D" gymnasium in Gyeongsan-si, and the victim E (n, 14 years old) was assigned to the above gymnasium from August 2013.

피고인은 2014. 4. 18. 22:00경부터 2014. 4. 19. 07:00경 사이에 위 체육관에서, 피해자에게 술을 먹여 피해자로 하여금 술에 취하게 만든 다음 “진실게임을 하자, 섹스해 보았냐”라고 말한 후 피해자에게 키스를 하고, "미안하다, 미안하다, 이러면 안 되는데"라고 말을 하면서, 자는 척하면서 벽쪽으로 몸을 붙여 상황을 모면하려는 피해자의 가슴을 만지고 피해자의 젖꼭지를 빨고, 피해자의 바지를 벗겨 피해자의 성기를 만지고, 피고인의 입으로 피해자의 성기를 빨고, 피해자의 다리를 들어 피해자를 간음하려 하였으나 피해자가 움직이는 바람에 그 뜻을 이루지 못하고 그 상태에서 사정을 하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant attempted to have sexual intercourse with a juvenile who was a juvenile by force as above, but did not have attempted to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Each investigation report (including attached documents and photographs);

1. Recording notes;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written appraisal;

1. Article 7 (6), (5) and (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, concerning the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following consideration shall be made again for the reason of sentencing);

1. Determination on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 21(2), (3), and (4) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse

1. The gist of the allegation is that the Defendant merely asked the victim against the victim’s will and did not intend to engage in sexual intercourse with the victim by force.

arrow