1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, with the exception of dismissal or addition of some contents, and thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the

Article 76(1) [Attachment 2] of the former Enforcement Rule of the State Contracts Act provides that “An appeal was dismissed,” among the contents of “each week 2 at the bottom of the 10th judgment of the first instance court,” stating that “The appeal was dismissed, and the Supreme Court has been dismissed on September 5, 2017 by the Plaintiffs, but the appeal was finalized on September 5, 2017 by the Supreme Court.” The following is added to “the first instance judgment” of the 14th judgment. 5th judgment of the first instance: (5) In the case of restricting participation in bidding against unjust enterprisers, the head of each central government agency may reduce the period of restriction on qualification by up to 1/2 of the period stipulated in subparagraph 2, taking into account the motive, content and frequency of the act of violation, etc.