A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 29, 2016, at around 20:10, the Defendant attached C and Si expenses on the grounds that the Defendant would be bad to dispute with female-friendly districts on the coast of the building B in Gyeongnam-si, B. On May 29, 2016. On the ground that E, a policeman affiliated with the D Zone of the 112 Police Station, dispatched upon receipt of the 112 report, did not restrain the above C and only stop himself, the Defendant threatened the said E’s chest by hand on three occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to E, C, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victimized police officers;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The basic area (from June to January 1) of the sentencing criteria [the scope of recommended punishment] and the basic area (from June to April) of the sentencing criteria (the person who has any special sentencing factors) shall interfere with the performance of official duties;

2. The defendant, who has a specific reason for sentencing, reflects his mistake and does not repeat the crime, is judged as above on the grounds that he was sentenced to punishment on the grounds that he was sentenced to punishment by taking account of the age, sex, environment, circumstances leading to the crime, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc. as stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act.