logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2020.05.14 2019고단1132
강제추행
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 피해자 B에 대한 강제추행 피고인은 2019. 5. 11. 22:30경 강릉시 C 지하 1층 D 클럽에서 춤을 추던 피해자 B(가명, 여, 27세)의 뒤로 다가가 몸을 밀착하여 춤을 추다가 피해자로부터 거절의 의사표시를 들었음에도, 같은 날 23:20경 피해자의 뒤로 다가가 갑자기 피해자의 치마 허리춤에 손을 집어넣었고 이에 피해자에게서 “한번 더 그러면 신고하겠다”는 취지의 말을 들었는데도 계속하여 피해자의 주변을 맴돌다가, 같은 날 23:40경 피해자의 뒤로 다가가 갑자기 피해자의 목부터 허리와 엉덩이까지 손가락으로 훑어 내려갔다.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

2. The Defendant, at around 00:00 on May 12, 2019, by compulsion of indecent act against the victim E, went back to a club to find one-day activities at the places specified in paragraph (1), followed by the victim E (one’s name, one’s age, 27 years old) and went back under the victim’s right panty and walk up above to the point of panty.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness B (title), E (title), F, G, and H;

1. Each police statement of the B (tentative) and E (tentative name);

1. Reports on internal investigation, attaching photographs of the victim B and E, and photographs of the victims of the crime;

1. A criminal investigation report (on-site investigation and on-site photographing), a photo of the place where the occurrence occurred [the defendant is denied to the effect that he/she did not commit any indecent act as described in the facts charged against the victims. In a case where the statements made by witnesses, including the victim, are mutually consistent and consistent with the facts charged, they shall not be rejected without permission, unless there is any other reliable evidence to deem that they are objectively reliable (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2012Do2631, Jun. 28, 2012). The circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court are as follows.

arrow