beta
Text
1. The plaintiff shall receive on January 21, 2002 from the Jung-gu District Court's annual registry office with respect to each real estate stated in the attached list.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On December 20, 200, in order to return the principal and interest of the investment in relation to the investment of KRW 50 million from G, the Plaintiff completed the registration of the establishment of a mortgage of KRW 80 million with respect to each real estate listed in the separate sheet owned by G as stated in paragraph (1) of this Article, for the purpose of returning the principal and interest of the investment.
B. G died on February 21, 2011, and there was no lineal descendant, spouse, or lineal ascendant at that time.
G There are H, I, Defendant E, and Defendant F with the punishment of G, and H died before G dies in an unmarried state, and H died before G before G dies, and Defendant C, Defendant C, and Defendant D, the wife, died before G died, and Defendant C and Defendant D inherited G on behalf of the wife.
[Ground of recognition] The entry of Gap evidence No. 1, the fact-finding results on the Jung-gu Jung-gu J community service center in Ilyang-gu, Jungyang-gu and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the facts found above, since the Plaintiff’s claim against the Plaintiff on January 21, 2012, which was 10 years after the expiration of the extinctive prescription, which was able to be deemed to have been recognized as an obligation to return the principal and interest of the investment, upon establishing a collateral security right with G, was extinguished due to the expiration of the extinctive prescription, the Plaintiff may claim for the implementation of the cancellation registration procedure on January 21, 2012 against the Defendants, who are the inheritor of G, for shares in proportion to their shares; Defendant C and D as to shares in 2/21 (i.e., 1/3 x 3/7); and for shares in 2/21 (i.e., 1/3 x 2/7); and Defendant E and F as to shares in 1/3 each on January 21, 2012.
3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is accepted on the ground of the reasons.