1. The part demanding delivery of the building among the principal lawsuit of the intervenor succeeding to the plaintiff shall be dismissed, respectively.

2. The plaintiff.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs and the Intervenor’s succession 1) As to the respective buildings listed in the Schedule I attached to Daejeon-gu, K, L, M, M, N, P, P, Q, R, T, and its ground (hereinafter “U”) on May 2, 2014, the Plaintiffs are Nonparty V, W, and X (hereinafter “former owners”).

B) The term “(i) KRW 30 million, monthly rent of KRW 33,00,00 (including value-added tax), and five (ii) years from June 15, 2014 to June 15, 2019, and (iii) KRW 300,000 from Daejeon High Court Decision 2013Na4294 (including value-added tax); and (iv) the term “V, W, and X loss” was determined to be terminated when the lease becomes final and conclusive (as of May 2, 14, 200, KRW 20,300,000 (including value-added tax); and (iv) on August 20, 2014, Plaintiff 201 and Plaintiff 30,000,000,000 won (including KRW 30,000,000,000,000,000) were newly determined as the lease agreement between Plaintiff 15,215,2015.

(A) No. 22

The plaintiffs and the plaintiff's successor to U shall obtain the sublease from the former owners and shall indicate the attached Table 208 (Defendant I possession), 301 (Defendant E possession), 303 (Defendant F possession), 304 (Defendant G possession), and 306 (Defendant H possession), and the attached Table 1 and 2 in the attached Table 3 among the buildings listed in the attached Table 1 list.