The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The lower court determined punishment, taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant, together with accomplices, established a floating corporation and opened a nominal account and distributed the means of access; (b) the means of access distributed by the Defendant is considerably high; (c) the means of access distributed are used for the so-called Bosing or illegal sports gambling; (d) the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated offense; and (e) the same should be considered when judgment is rendered simultaneously with the offense of violating the Electronic

B. Although there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the original judgment as the new sentencing materials have not been submitted in the trial court, and considering the various reasons revealed in the oral proceedings, the lower court’s sentencing is too inappropriate and it does not seem to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

C. Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unreasonable sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.