1. The decision made by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on August 3, 2017 by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on the case No. 2016 Won2431 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Basic facts

가. 원고의 이 사건 출원서비스표 1) 출원번호/출원일: B/C 2) 구 성: 3) 지정서비스업: 서비스업류 구분 제43류의 식음료 준비업, 간이식당업, 간이음식점업, 라면전문점업, 국수전문점업, 레스토랑업, 식당체인업, 일본음식점업, 중국음식점업, 한식점업, 포장판매식당업, 음식준비업. 나. 선등록서비스표 1) 등록번호/출원일/등록일: 서비스표등록 D/E/F 2) 구 성: 3) 지정서비스업: 서비스업류 구분 제43류의 간이식당업, 레스토랑업, 뷔페식당업, 서양음식점업, 셀프서비스식당업, 스낵바업, 일본음식점업, 제과점업, 주점업, 중국음식점업, 카페업, 카페테리아업, 칵테일라운지서비스업, 커피전문점업, 패스트푸드식당업, 한식점업. 4 등록권리자: G

C. On November 25, 2015, the examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office notified the Plaintiff on November 25, 2015 that “The name of “Is the United States of America” and “Is the United States of America,” which is the essential part of the pending service mark, are identical or similar to that of the same kind of service business, and its designated service business is also the same or similar. Therefore, the pending service mark falls under Article 7(1)7 of the former Trademark Act (wholly amended by Act No. 14033, Feb. 29, 2016; hereinafter the same shall apply) in relation to the pre-registered service mark.” On April 25, 2016, the examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office presented a notice to the Plaintiff, stating that “The instant pending service mark falls under Article 7(1)7 of the former Trademark Act (wholly amended by Act No. 14033, Feb. 29, 2016).” The Plaintiff dismissed the Plaintiff’s appeal on April 25, 2017.

The reason is that the pending service mark is similar to the pre-registered service mark because the pre-registered service mark of this case is similar to the pre-registered service mark because the pre-registered service mark of this case is in common.

In addition, the pending service mark of this case.