A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person running real estate business, and the victim C is a construction company that mainly runs the building business, and the defendant introduced the victim as a building site of five parcels of land Do- one-day land at the time when the Gyeongyang-nam, and the defendant was in a relationship between the owner of the above site and the victim to arrange the land trade.

On January 10, 2015, the Defendant, at the office of Ulsan-gu E Co., Ltd., Ulsan-gu around January 10, 2015, sold to the representative F of the victim company “in order to raise the project funds.”

On the other hand, the five parcels necessary for the construction shall not be purchased at one time, and on the other, the "387 square meters of G site G site G in Yyangyang-si, Gyeongyang-nam" will be purchased first, and 50 million won as down payment and intermediate payment will be taken over the ownership of the above land, which is owned by ASEAN, by acquiring the props of the remaining four parcels.

“In the end,” the victim and the victim concluded a land sales contract stating that “The intermediate payment is KRW 20 million on the date of the contract, and KRW 30 million on January 12, 2015, and the intermediate payment is KRW 30 million on March 30, 2015, and that “the remainder payment is KRW 250 million due to the registration of ownership transfer and the cancellation and redemption of the registration of the establishment of a right to collateral security established on the instant land” was paid on March 30, 2015.

However, the Defendant was unable to pay interest for loans borrowed from the Saemaul Treasury and bond company at the time of the purchase of the land at the time of the purchase of the land at the time of the purchase of the land at the time, and the situation where the commencement of auction procedure for the said land was anticipated was anticipated since the Defendant was urged to repay the secured debt for the right to collateral security of G land at the time of the purchase of the land at the time of the above was the situation where the commencement of auction procedure for the said land was anticipated. Therefore, even if the Defendant received the down payment and the intermediate payment from the injured party, he did not have the intent

The defendant is the victim as above.