beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
Reasons
Criminal facts
[criminal record] On January 12, 2016, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) at the Seoul High Court on January 12, 201, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on March 4, 2016.
[2] The defendant's criminal facts are that the husband's husband is not the managing director of Samsung Electronic, and the husband's work as a senior executive director of the automobile company is not a senior executive director of the automobile company. The defendant's criminal facts are that the victim C does not have the husband's work as a senior executive director of Samsung Electronic, and the husband's work as a senior executive director of the automobile company, and the husband's branch has worked as a senior executive director of the
“Influencing the victim to obtain money from the damaged person,” and around July 6, 2015, the victim would be able to purchase the low typ vehicle exported from Hyundai Motor to East Asia at a half price.
After receiving a remittance of 1,6280,000 won from the injured party to purchase a vehicle with a higher quality than that of domestic vehicles in return for the purchase of the export vehicle with a higher quality than that of domestic vehicles, the victim believed the victim to believe the victim's speech by purchasing a vehicle with a higher quality of 1,6280,000 won in return for the money of the defendant and sending it to the injured party.
On July 15, 2015, the Defendant called the victim that “The Defendant sent 16 million won to the victim, who purchased the highest price for export in one half of the half of the total prices.”
However, as seen above, the Defendant did not have an intention to purchase a vehicle at a half price as promised by the victim, and was willing to receive money from the victim to use it for the repayment of his personal obligation. Moreover, even if there were no particular property or income, the Defendant was liable for the debt equivalent to KRW 80 million at the time, so there is an intention or ability to pay the above money to the victim properly.