logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2010.08.26 2009가합62559
보직변경발령무효확인 등
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a company that operates an indoor play park, a lot, etc.

Plaintiff

A, C, and D have worked as the deputy head (class 1 in general position), Plaintiff B as the team leader (class 1 in general position), Plaintiff E, and F as the appointment (class 2 in general position) at each same place of business.

B. A change in the personnel management system and bonus system (1) around May 2007, the Defendant prepared a proposal to grant the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the class 1, 2 in the position of the team leader in which the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the class 1 members was possible, and the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of the assignment of

(2) In addition, around May 2007, the Defendant prepared a proposal for the change of the payment system of the employee’s benefits to pay 800% of the basic salary as bonus regardless of the personnel status with respect to the employees of the class 2 or higher (hereinafter “inter-class employees”) during the period of 2008, to convert part of the bonus into the performance bonus and to pay it differently according to the personnel status and the amount of the bonus.

(3) On May 25, 2007, the Defendant held an explanatory meeting on the “standard for granting of the above position” and “the “the proposal for the modification of the system for paying the pay of the part-time employee.” Of the 72 total number of the 72 executive members, the Defendant signed a written consent on May 25, 2007, stating that the details of the institutional improvement and the amendment of the relevant regulations regarding the implementation of the company’s “the proposal for granting position” and the “the proposal for the modification of the system for paying the part-time employee” were sufficiently well informed through the explanatory meeting, and that this would express his/her consent as follows.

(4) The defendant is in the personnel management division with respect to the executive members around June 2007, as part of the bonus since 2008.

arrow