1. Of the principal lawsuit against the Defendant (Counterclaim Defendant, Appointed Party) Seoul National University Hospital, the first, second, February 1, 200.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is E’s wife, and the Selection C and D are children of E.

(b) E is a facility established to control students and outside persons entering and leaving the C Points Library established at the central library of the F University;

On September 16, 1997, while working in the hospital, discovered from the above body point adjacent to the hospital, and was transferred to the emergency room of the new village hybrid hospital, and was hospitalized in the hospital. G, at the time of the emergency room of the new village hybrid hospital, was hospitalized in the hospital. At the time, G, a medical doctor in charge of the emergency room of the new village hybrid hospital, refers to “an occurrence caused by alcohol toxicity” in the E’s emergency medical records.

In other words, on September 23, 1997, the medical doctor of the hospital stated the name of the disease in the medical certificate of E as "opulty". On October 4, 1997, H, the medical doctor of the hospital, stated the name of the disease in the medical certificate of E as "perulty hopty hopty hopum", and I, the medical doctor of the same hospital, in the medical certificate of E on December 15, 1997, the name of the disease in the medical certificate of E, i.e., the name of the disease in the medical certificate of E, i.e., the name of the disease in the form of 2botlele/day hopty x 30yr.

C. E asserted that his injury constitutes an occupational accident, and filed a medical care benefit application with the Korea Teachers Pension Foundation on December 15, 1997, but the Korea Teachers Pension Foundation rejected the above injury on the ground that it cannot be seen as an occupational accident. D.

Accordingly, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the F University of Seoul Western District Court 2001Kahap1409, asserting that the injury of the plaintiff constitutes occupational accident, but the above court dismissed the plaintiff's claim on March 7, 2003. On February 1, 2005, the appellate court rendered a judgment against the plaintiff's appeal and the appellate court against the purport that all the plaintiff's claim expanded in the above appellate court dismissed (Seoul High Court 2003Na24743). The above judgment is June 24, 2005.