A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for nine months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 27, 2011, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2,50,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the Suwon District Court’s House, and on April 28, 2015, issued a summary order of KRW 3,00,000 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) on the part of the Suwon District Court’s House.

1. On October 14, 2017, the Defendant was driven under the influence of alcohol level of 0.224% from the 107 front parking lots of the new apartment in Ethacheon-si, Ethacheon-si, to the front road of about 15km-ro, 1913, from the 107 front parking lots of the new apartment in Ethacheon-si to the front road.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the driving of Lone Star in the Ireland, who violates the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter referred to as the "Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes"), and the Road Traffic Act (after an accident).

On October 14, 2017, as described in paragraph 1 of around 21:10, the Defendant driven the above van while under the influence of alcohol, and proceeded at a speed of about 80 km per hour at a speed of about 10 km in front of the short-distance distance of 5-7, 1913, in the margin of Echeon-si.

At night, the Defendant was the victim C(32) prior to the same direction, and the Defendant was behind the victim C(32) and the D-wing and Ⅲ Cargo in the same direction. As such, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating and safely driving the steering gear and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive under the influence of drinking so as to stop in red signals due to negligence, which led to the Defendant’s failure to drive under the influence of drinking, received the part on the left side of the above cargo vehicle driven by C, which was driven by the Defendant, and received the part on the left side of the above cargo vehicle, which was driven by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant committed the above occupational negligence.