A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 03:00 on August 6, 2017, the Defendant was subject to 112 reporting, “Sacrife fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting boat,” which was sent to the police station G police box belonging to the Jung-gu Police Station G police box, H and police officer I, when fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting fighting with E and F.

The Defendant is dissatisfied with the complaint, and the Defendant “I am in this form the answer that I am in this sense.”

“Along with the balth of H’s flaps, the balth of H was sallled, and the balth of the H’s flaps balth of the H, and balth of the instant I’s left eye.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H, I, and J;

1. The K's statement;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the Defendant asserts to the effect that he was in a state of mental or physical loss or mental weakness at the time of the instant case.

According to the records, although the defendant can be acknowledged that he was drinking at the time of the crime of this case, in light of the background leading up to the crime of this case, the means and method of the crime of this case, and the defendant's speech and behavior before and after the crime of this case, the defendant was under the influence of alcohol and had no or weak ability to discern things or make decisions.

Since the above argument cannot be accepted, it shall not be accepted.

The reason for sentencing is that the nature of the crime is not less severe in light of the degree of tangible force that the defendant uses to police officers, or that there is no criminal history that exceeds the fine, or that there is no criminal history that exceeds the fine, or that there are all other factors of sentencing such as the age, sex, environment, etc. of the defendant.