The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On November 01, 2019, at around 21:30, the Defendant driven three-lanes of the five-lanes in front of the C intersection in the Dong-gu, Dong-gu, in Busan, into the Busan, the E-car volume. In the previous case, the Defendant, on the ground that the Defendant, at the front of the F apartment apartment intersection, driven the vehicle under the right left left by the H Village bus bus vehicle that is driven by the victim G (Nam, 56) prior to the operation of the F apartment, was made by driving the said vehicle, which is dangerous things, and then, the Defendant was threatened by driving the said vehicle for about 35 seconds, by passing the damaged vehicle on purpose, and interfering with the passage of the damaged vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing black booms and video CDs for damaged vehicles;

1. Relevant Article 284 of the Criminal Act and Articles 283 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (the conversion of 100,000 won into one day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the Defendant has no record of punishment except for a fine imposed for a violation of the Building Act in 1985; that there is no record of the Defendant’s fault; that the investigation agency reflects his fault in depth and serves the neighbor; that is, it is difficult to deem that the Defendant had a driver of a damaged vehicle feel the risk of an accident; that there was a risk of a collision at a time when the vehicle is overtaken; that the victim also left the left at a certain time; that there was a risk of collision at a time when the vehicle is overtaken; that the Defendant’s vehicle is driving at a speed of 54 to 55 km/h; that the Defendant’s bus stops is not at the location where the bus stops, and that the Defendant’s village is not at the location where the bus stops, but at the location where the bus stops, and that it is not at the location of the Defendant’s village, etc.; and that the Defendant and village is not at the location of the bus.