A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 26, 2014, the Defendant: (a) 01:40 on May 26, 2014, 201; (b) 21 on the Daegu Hagu Hagu Gyeong-gu merchants’ 21, coming home and returned from the 3 public security center merchant in front of the 3 public security center; and (c) Hagu Hagu Hagu Hagu Hagu Hagu, a police officer, who belongs to the D District of the D District of the police station in Daegu Hagu Hagu Hagu Hagu Hagu, called “this son, su fe, fe, fe, f, f, f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., a police officer affiliated with the said D District f.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials E and F in relation to the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements made to F and E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;