1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the instant case is as follows. The Plaintiff’s assertion added to this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for those additional determination as to the Plaintiff’s assertion as stated in paragraph (2) below, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be dried;

A. On the second and third sides of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the above money" of the first instance No. 8 shall be deemed to be "the defendant," "G" of the third th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th h h", "the plaintiff," "the plaintiff," "1,925,311th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th h.

B. On the fifth side of the judgment of the court of first instance, the first to Twelve of the fifth to Twelve of the judgment shall be applied as follows.

【In light of the following circumstances, the above-mentioned facts, evidence, evidence of Gap 11, 17, 18, 29, evidence of Eul 4 and 9, and the overall purport of arguments and arguments, it is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the amount of loans to the defendant was over the above 57,643,140 won and over the above 115,943,140 won, which the defendant borrowed from the defendant, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it ( even according to the plaintiff’s assertion, D lent to the defendant a total of KRW 115,943,140,00 won, which is the sum of principal of each loan of this case, not a loan of KRW 132,00,000,000,000,000 won, which is the sum of principal of each loan of this case, and thus, the plaintiff did not assert against the defendant the principal and interest of each loan of this case.