logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.03.29 2017고단2291
강제추행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 12, 2017, around 16:10 on August 16, 2017, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim D (M, 23 years of age) who was playing water at the sea of Busan C Bath 6 times in front of the Sea.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of D’s statutory statement legislation

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 298 of the Selection of Punishment Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;

1. Article 47(1) and Article 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Exempted from disclosure and notification orders, the proviso to Article 49(1) and the proviso to Article 50(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children’s Sex Offenses (in full view of all the circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, family relation, background and process of the instant crime, benefits and preventive effects expected from the instant disclosure order and notification order, and disadvantages and side effects therefrom, there are special circumstances that may not disclose and notify the Defendant’s personal information);

1. Where the registration of personal information under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and the conviction of the accused against whom the obligation to file a provisional payment order is finalized, the accused is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and the accused is obligated to submit personal information to the head of the competent police office pursuant to Article 43 of the same Act

Defendant

The Defendant did not have committed the instant crime, and was one of the parties at the time of the instant crime.

E and F claimed that one of them commits an indecent act against the victim because they had a frighten and f's body in a bathing beach. Therefore, one of them asserts that one of them commits an indecent act against the victim.

However, according to the victim D's testimony, it can be confirmed that the defendant was the party who committed the crime of this case, and the E and F are present as a witness in this court.

arrow