logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.02.02 2016누49015
유족급여 및 장의비부지급 처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and it is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding some contents and adding some contents. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The witness E testimony in the fourth 1-2 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be considered as the witness E testimony of the court of first instance.

Then, “In short of recognition” in the fifth sentence of the first instance judgment, “(the same shall apply even if the Plaintiff neglected the results of the fact inquiry on Gap evidence 9-1 and 2 submitted by the first instance court, the Seoul Regional Head of the National Health Insurance Corporation of this Court, and the Gangnam-west Vice Governor of the National Health Insurance Corporation.”

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow