logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.05.16 2012고정6965
폭행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2012 High Court Decision 6965]

1. Around 19:20 on June 24, 2012, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant on the ground that the victim C(s) located in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (n, 33 years of age) made an increase while having a malicious evaluation on the Defendant’s fright to the fright of the Defendant. “Around 19:20, the Defendant assaulted the victim C’s face on one occasion with his hand, and followed up the situation on the ground that the victim E(s) who was a customer who observed the said situation was frightd to fright a woman, and that he was frighted to fright to fright the fright of the victim E, and that he was frighted to fright the fright of the victim E.

2. The Defendant interfered with the business of the victim C by force, such as assaulting the date, time, and place set forth in paragraph (1) at the same time and time as above, leaving the small land, fruits, etc. displayed in the said DNA, raising the speech, etc. on the floor.

[2012 High Court Decision 696]

3. A person in violation of the Promotion of the Motion Pictures and Video Products Act may not offer, display, or keep for viewing, any video products that have not been classified, for viewing, or for viewing, a video product that has not been classified. However, the Defendant offered unlawful video products for viewing by having 5,000 won per hour from the customers who found the place in G located in the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City from May 18, 2012 to July 15, 2012, and had them display and keep for this purpose.

Summary of Evidence

[2012 High Court Decision 6965]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each written statement C and E [2012 high-level 696]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A written statement of the defendant;

1. A H statement;

1. Reporting on detection;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 of the Criminal Act, which include applicable law to the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of punishment.

arrow