(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.06.25 2015고단520

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.06.25 2015고단520

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 7, 2014, at around 02:15, the Defendant took the face of a fluence on the ground that the victim E (son and 23 years of age) was fluent in front of D, operated by the Defendant in the Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Yannam-gu, Seoul, about December 7, 2014, she fluencing a fluent face, such as drinking a baby while drinking a fluor and drinking a baby.

In this way, the defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the 42-day closed colon's bones, which requires treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement made by the police in relation to E;

1. Description of the written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of each of the Acts and subordinate statutes to images of photographs of damaged parts, and photographs printing CCTVs;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is based on the case where the defendant committed a serious injury by assaulting the victim, and thus the victim wants to strong punishment, medical expenses, etc., the defendant did not pay the victim, and there was a record of punishment for the same kind of crime in around 2013. Meanwhile, the victim was under the influence of alcohol, and the victim was under the influence of alcohol, and the defendant prepared three million won for the recovery of damage, but failed to deposit because he could not specify the victim's personal information, and there was no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine, and the defendant appears to be contrary to the defendant's recognition of the crime, and the sentence shall be determined as ordered in consideration of various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of the instant case, such as age, character and conduct, and environment of

참조조문

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2013.02.18 2012고단6494

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.03.24 2016고단3092

-서울동부지방법원 2016.12.16 2016고단1297

-수원지방법원 2013.02.15 2012고단5457

-광주지방법원 2016.11.30 2016고단3913